Please rate the following questions:
Overall quality of the meeting.
How well did the educational sessions give a balanced view of therapeutic options, including the use
of generic names?
For the following objective, please rate the statements that follow it.
Evaluate different means of treatment and surgical techniques in liver transplantation.
- my professional knowledge has increased
- my professional competence will increase
- my performance in my professional practice will change
Evaluate and select patients for anesthesia/critical care medicine in high risk patients for liver
transplantation.
Interpret the selection criteria and outcomes of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.
Incorporate new modalities of treatment for viral and recurrent disease in liver transplantation.
Do you believe this activity:
was appropriate for the scope of your professional activities?
will result in your ability to improve your practice?
Was the educational content scientifically sound?
Was the educational content free from commercial bias?
Was the mode of education effective for learning?
If faculty spoke about off-label or investigational uses of a product, was that information disclosed to you?
If you answered "No" to any of the above questions, please explain:
Were you solicited by sales personnel in an educational room while you attended this educational activity?
If you answered "Yes" to the above question, please explain:
What did you learn during this activity that you intend to integrate into your practice?
List any perceived practice "gaps" you would like further trainings focused on:
Are you interested in basic, intermediate or advanced level trainings? (Choose one)
What barriers might you have that would interfere with implementaton of new information from this training?
How can this training be improved to impact your competence or practice?
Additional comments:
