Llllogojpg save
LLL Psychedelic Integration: Premise and Promise (ANCC, ASWB, NY PSY, & ICF)
Mr pencil

How would you like your name to appear on your certificate?



What activities did you attend at the event?
Agreement
By completing this form, you attest that you have participated in all selected activities in thier entirety.
Please rate the following:
The program was relevant to my work.
Content matched stated objectives.
Usefulness of handouts/AV/technology.
Quality of facilities and facility accommodations.
How well did the educational sessions give a balanced view of therapeutic options, including the use of generic names?
If you rated any of the above questions with 'fair,' 'poor,' 'disagree,' or 'strongly disagree' please explain in detail (e.g. session title, speaker name, situtation):
The instructor was knowledgeable about the content
The instructor was knowledgeable about the content
The instructor was knowledgeable about the content
The instructor was knowledgeable about the content
The instructor was knowledgeable about the content
The instructor was knowledgeable about the content
The instructor was knowledgeable about the content
The instructor was knowledgeable about the content
The instructor was knowledgeable about the content
The instructor was knowledgeable about the content
The instructor was knowledgeable about the content
Objective 1: Discuss the historical justifications for psychedelic clinical research
By meeting the above objective my professional competence will increase because I have acquired new strategies to use in my practice.
By meeting the above objective my professional performance will improve because I should be able to implement the new strategies.
By meeting the above objective my patient outcomes should improve due to the implementation of newly-learned strategies.
The teaching methods used were appropriate to the objectives
The instructor presented the subject matter clearly
The instructor presented the subject matter clearly
The instructor presented the subject matter clearly
The instructor presented the subject matter clearly
The instructor presented the subject matter clearly
The instructor presented the subject matter clearly
The instructor presented the subject matter clearly
The instructor presented the subject matter clearly
The instructor presented the subject matter clearly
The instructor presented the subject matter clearly
The instructor presented the subject matter clearly
Objective 2: Describe key theoretical approaches to psychedelic-assisted therapy
By meeting the above objective my professional competence will increase because I have acquired new strategies to use in my practice.
By meeting the above objective my professional performance will improve because I should be able to implement the new strategies.
By meeting the above objective my patient outcomes should improve due to the implementation of newly-learned strategies.
The teaching methods used were appropriate to the objectives
The instructor was responsive to participants
The instructor was responsive to participants
The instructor was responsive to participants
The instructor was responsive to participants
The instructor was responsive to participants
The instructor was responsive to participants
The instructor was responsive to participants
The instructor was responsive to participants
The instructor was responsive to participants
The instructor was responsive to participants
The instructor was responsive to participants
Objective 3: Discuss the state of psychedelic clinical research, rescheduling efforts, and how psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy works with clients
By meeting the above objective my professional competence will increase because I have acquired new strategies to use in my practice.
By meeting the above objective my professional performance will improve because I should be able to implement the new strategies.
By meeting the above objective my patient outcomes should improve due to the implementation of newly-learned strategies.
The teaching methods used were appropriate to the objectives
The instructor used technology effectively
Psychedelic-assisted Psychotherapy vs. Psycdedelic Integration Therapy
Mechanisms of impact (psychedelic, psycholitic, pharmacological)
Framework for drug assisted psychotherapy (preparation, experience, integration)
Set and Setting
The instructor used technology effectively
What is included under the umbrella of psychedelics
The effects of psychedelics
The drugs, their history and the early research efforts
The instructor used technology effectively
1. Historical models and theories of psychedelic-assisted therapy
2. Other considerations for providers
The instructor used technology effectively
What is the mystical experience and how is it measured?
Psychedelics in Treatment of Alcohol Dependence: Historical & Cross Cultural Models
Psilocybin rationale and layout of study
Patient experiences and common questions
The instructor used technology effectively
Defining drug-assisted psychotherapy
Exploring the use of MDMA specifically for PTSD
Therapeutic approach
Planning for the session (during and after)
The instructor used technology effectively
Psychedelic HR Overview
Ethics in psychedelic-assisted therapy - what everyone ought to know
Defining preparation
The instructor used technology effectively
Responding to requests for help after difficult experiences
Defining integration
Key principles for patients and providers
The instructor used technology effectively
Harm Reduction Informed Preparation for people who are considering using psychedelics
Psychedelic integration: assessment, challenges and red flags
The instructor used technology effectively
Role plays format and instruction
Demonstration of an integration session
Breakout group session to practice post-experience integration
The instructor used technology effectively
Demonstration of an integration sessCioVn: Revised
Breakout group session to practice post-experience integration
The instructor used technology effectively
Role plays debrief and discussion
The many open questions about the future of addiction and trauma treatment with psychedelics
Please tell us about any sessions you found particularly good or bad.
Please tell us about any objectives you feel we accomplished well or poorly. 
Please tell us about any presenters you found particularly good or bad.
Please answer the following:
Do you believe this activity was appropriate for the scope of your professional activities?
Was the educational content scientifically sound?
If faculty spoke about off-label or investigational uses of a product, was that information disclosed to you?
Was the mode of education effective to learning?
If you answered "No" to any of the above questions, please explain.
Did you perceive any product/service/company/commercial bias in any educational session you attended or materials you received?
If you answered "Yes" to the above question, please detail the situation below (e.g. session title, speaker name):
Were you solicited by sales personnel in an educational room (other areas do not matter) while you attended this educational activity?
If you answered "Yes" to the above question, please explain in detail (e.g. who, when, where):
How much did you learn as a result of this education program?
What specifically did you learn during this activity that you intend to integrate into your practice?

What questions have arisen in your practice for which you need answers/strategies that you can implement?

What patient/client problems or patient/client challenges do you feel you are not able to address appropriately or to your satisfaction?
What problems are your patients/clients communicating to you that need attention or follow up?

Are you interested in basic, intermediate or advanced level trainings?

What barriers might you have that would interfere with implementation of new information learned from this training?

How can this training (the overall meeting) be improved to better impact competence, performance and/or patient/client outcomes?

Additional comments:

How did you attend this course?
Mr question
Provided by amedco