Please rate the following:
Overall quality of the meeting
The program was relevant to my work
Content matched stated objectives
Usefulness of handouts/AV
Please rate how well the following objective was met:
Describe how the Case/Disease/Wellness/Absence Management program was developed.
Please rate how well the objective was met:
Discuss the economic impact of ill health.
Discuss how to drive innovations in healthcare by shaping future policy.
Identify the complexities of integrating the financing, the delivery and the evaluation of primary care
across multiple stakeholders.
List data sources and discuss how they are optimized for disease management.
Describe how to implement new models of care for chronic illness care.
Describe the role that value based design plays in chronic care.
Discuss how connected health improves access, quality and efficiency.
Discuss the global initiatives in chronic care management.
Dsicuss common sense reforms that address challenges of chronic disease.
Discuss why regional coalitions are powerful change agents.
Discuss basic concepts of chronic disease management and how it is not being address.
Describe how to optimize patient education tools.
Define the measures used to monitor and provide feedback to clinicians and the contribution of
community partners.
Describe how the personalized home health monitoring technology assists Medicare patients with
severe chronic illness to live healthier and happy lives.
Review the five core functions of a health coach.
Identify trends in effective management of self-funded self plans.
Comfort of rooms
Discuss the limitations of knowledge and good intentions.
Discuss the findings to date and what patients value and need from an ePHR.
List the tools that make it easier for providers to provide quality care by utilizing the electronic
medical record.
How well did the educational sessions give a balanced view of therapeutic options, including the use
of generic names?
Describe how to integrate patients with a diagnosis of major depression into a primary care setting.
Implement self management support through patient social networks.
Discuss the design, empirical underpinnings and the applications of the patient activation measure
(PAM).
Do you believe this activity:
increased your professional knowledge?
will increase your professional competence?
will result in performance changes in your professional practice?
was appropriate for the scope of your professional activities?
will result in your ability to improve your practice?
Was the educational content scientifically sound?
If faculty spoke about off-label or investigational uss of a product, was that information disclosed to you?
Was the mode of education effective to learning?
Were you solicited by sales pesonnel in an educatonal room while you attended this educational activity?
List any perceived practice "gaps" which you would like to see the focus of future trainings.
Are you interested in basic, intermediate or advanced level trainings?
What barriers might you have that would interfere with implementation of new information learned from this training?
How can this training be improved to impact your competence or practice?
Please list any educational needs/topics you would like to see addressed in future meetings.
Additional comments:
