Logo1
AATH - 2020 Research Presentation - Annual Conference
Mr pencil

How would you like your name to appear on your certificate?



What activities did you attend at the event?
Agreement
By completing this form, you attest that you have participated in all selected activities in thier entirety.
Only Florida licensees need to answer this question. Notice to Florida Licensees: In order for us to report your hours to CE Broker, you MUST provide us with your Florida alpha-numberic license number (e.g., CDCA.XXXXXX, LICDCII.XXXXXX, LCDCII.XXXXXX, LICDC.XXXXXX). Please be sure to enter this number accurately, or CE Broker will not record your hours. 
The instructor was knowledgeable about the content
The instructor was knowledgeable about the content
The instructor was knowledgeable about the content
The instructor was knowledgeable about the content
Objective 1: Learn the latest applications and benefits of therapeutic humor presented by field experts.
By meeting the above objective my professional competence will increase because I have acquired new strategies to use in my practice.
By meeting the above objective my professional performance will improve because I should be able to implement the new strategies.
By meeting the above objective my patient outcomes should improve due to the implementation of newly-learned strategies.
The teaching methods used were appropriate to the objectives
The instructor presented the subject matter clearly
The instructor presented the subject matter clearly
The instructor presented the subject matter clearly
The instructor presented the subject matter clearly
Objective 2: Expand the humor and laughter community
By meeting the above objective my professional competence will increase because I have acquired new strategies to use in my practice.
By meeting the above objective my professional performance will improve because I should be able to implement the new strategies.
By meeting the above objective my patient outcomes should improve due to the implementation of newly-learned strategies.
The teaching methods used were appropriate to the objectives
The instructor was responsive to participants
The instructor was responsive to participants
The instructor was responsive to participants
The instructor was responsive to participants
Objective 3: Provide useful information and current research and best practices in humor and laughter
By meeting the above objective my professional competence will increase because I have acquired new strategies to use in my practice.
By meeting the above objective my professional performance will improve because I should be able to implement the new strategies.
By meeting the above objective my patient outcomes should improve due to the implementation of newly-learned strategies.
The teaching methods used were appropriate to the objectives
The instructor used technology effectively
Compare fixations of professional comedians to non comedians when viewing cartoons.
Compare fixations during generation of comedic ideas vs mundane ideas.
Identify if fixations predict funniness.
The instructor used technology effectively
Understand the effect humor has on the perceived immediacy of a supervisor to their suboordinates.
The instructor used technology effectively
Identify concepts of business humor.
List exercises to practice for using humor in the workplace.
The instructor used technology effectively
Learn LY activities training program to 130 Lifestyle assistants in 30 RACHs in Victoria, Australia.
Evaluate its effectiveness using the five dimensions of Glasgow et al’s (1999) RE-AIM Evaluation Framework: Reach, Efficacy, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance. 
Please rate the following:
The program was relevant to my work.
Content matched stated objectives.
Technology user friendly
How well did the educational sessions give a balanced view of therapeutic options, including the use of generic names?
If you rated any of the above questions with 'fair,' 'poor,' 'disagree,' or 'strongly disagree' please explain in detail (e.g. session title, speaker name, situtation):
Please tell us about any sessions you found particularly good or bad
Please tell us about any objectives you feel we accomplished well or not so well 
Please tell us about any presenters you found particularly good or bad
Please answer the following:
Do you believe this activity was appropriate for the scope of your professional activities?
Was the educational content scientifically sound?
If faculty spoke about off-label or investigational uses of a product, was that information disclosed to you?
Was the mode of education effective to learning?
If you answered "No" to any of the above questions, please explain.
Did you perceive any product/service/company/commercial bias in any educational session you attended or materials you received?
If you answered "Yes" to the above question, please detail the situation below (e.g. session title, speaker name):
Were you solicited by sales personnel in an educational room (other areas do not matter) while you attended this educational activity?
If you answered "Yes" to the above question, please explain in detail (e.g. who, when, where):
How much did you learn as a result of this education program?
What specifically did you learn during this activity that you intend to integrate into your practice?

What questions have arisen in your practice for which you need answers/strategies that you can implement?

What patient/client problems or patient/client challenges do you feel you are not able to address appropriately or to your satisfaction?
What problems are your patients/clients communicating to you that need attention or follow up?

Are you interested in basic, intermediate or advanced level trainings?

What barriers might you have that would interfere with implementation of new information learned from this training?

How can this training (the overall meeting) be improved to better impact competence, performance and/or patient/client outcomes?

Additional comments:

Mr question
Provided by amedco