Logo1
RSS - 2020 Virtual Scientific Meeting (CAMPEP)
Mr pencil

How would you like your name to appear on your certificate?



What activities did you attend at the event?
Agreement
By completing this form, you attest that you have participated in all selected activities in thier entirety.
The instructor was knowledgeable about the content
The instructor was knowledgeable about the content
The instructor was knowledgeable about the content
The instructor was knowledgeable about the content
The instructor was knowledgeable about the content
The instructor was knowledgeable about the content
The instructor was knowledgeable about the content
The instructor was knowledgeable about the content
The instructor was knowledgeable about the content
The instructor was knowledgeable about the content
The instructor was knowledgeable about the content
The instructor was knowledgeable about the content
The instructor was knowledgeable about the content
Objective 1: Describe the technological advances in stereotactic radiosurgery/stereotactic body radiotherapy and how they are leading to improve patient lives and outcomes.
By meeting the above objective my professional competence will increase because I have acquired new strategies to use in my practice.
By meeting the above objective my professional performance will improve because I should be able to implement the new strategies.
By meeting the above objective my patient outcomes should improve due to the implementation of newly-learned strategies.
The teaching methods used were appropriate to the objectives
The instructor presented the subject matter clearly
The instructor presented the subject matter clearly
The instructor presented the subject matter clearly
The instructor presented the subject matter clearly
The instructor presented the subject matter clearly
The instructor presented the subject matter clearly
The instructor presented the subject matter clearly
The instructor presented the subject matter clearly
The instructor presented the subject matter clearly
The instructor presented the subject matter clearly
The instructor presented the subject matter clearly
The instructor presented the subject matter clearly
The instructor presented the subject matter clearly
Objective 2: Formulate strategies to integrate safefy and quality assurance methods in the delivery of stereotactic radiosurgery and stereotactic body radiotherapy.
By meeting the above objective my professional competence will increase because I have acquired new strategies to use in my practice.
By meeting the above objective my professional performance will improve because I should be able to implement the new strategies.
By meeting the above objective my patient outcomes should improve due to the implementation of newly-learned strategies.
The teaching methods used were appropriate to the objectives
The instructor was responsive to participants
The instructor was responsive to participants
The instructor was responsive to participants
The instructor was responsive to participants
The instructor was responsive to participants
The instructor was responsive to participants
The instructor was responsive to participants
The instructor was responsive to participants
The instructor was responsive to participants
The instructor was responsive to participants
The instructor was responsive to participants
The instructor was responsive to participants
The instructor was responsive to participants
Objective 3: Articulate the latest research findings regarding stereotactic radiosurgery/stereotactic body radiotherapy (SRS/SBRT), including combination SRS/SBRT with immunotherapy, for the treatment of a variety of cancer types to improve patient lives.
By meeting the above objective my professional competence will increase because I have acquired new strategies to use in my practice.
By meeting the above objective my professional performance will improve because I should be able to implement the new strategies.
By meeting the above objective my patient outcomes should improve due to the implementation of newly-learned strategies.
The teaching methods used were appropriate to the objectives
The instructor used technology effectively
Understand the current landscape of SRS/SBRT
Gain knowledge of the educational and research resources made available by the Radiosugery Society.
The instructor used technology effectively
Define the indications, contra-indications and patient selection criteria for SBRT and brachytherapy for the treatment of prostate cancer.
Describe the outcomes and toxicities of SBRT vs brachytherapy for prostate cancer.
Decribe the pros and cons of SBRT vs brachytherapy for the treatment of prostate cancer.
The instructor used technology effectively
Define the indications, contra-indications and patient selection criteria for SBRT treatment of ultra-central lung tumors.
Describe the outcomes, toxicities, risks and benefits of SBRT for ultra-central lung tumors.
Recognize clinical applications where SBRT may not be appropriate for the treatment of ultra-central lung tumors and enumerate alternative treatment approaches, radiation fractionation for ultra-central lung tumors.
The instructor used technology effectively
Describe the considerations for tumor and normal tissue volume segmentation, dose regimens and technical aspects of SRS treatment planning and delivery for brain metastases.
Describe the considerations for tumor and normal tissue volume segmentation, dose regimens, motion management, tumor tracking and technical aspects of SBRT treatment planning and delivery of lung tumors.
Describe the considerations for tumor and normal tissue volume segmentation, dose regimens and technical aspects of SBRT treatment planning and delivery for prostate cancer.
The instructor used technology effectively
Imaging & Targeting for Stereotactic Raditherapy
Imaging & Targeting for Stereotactic Raditherapy
The instructor used technology effectively
Understand the indications, contra-indications, patient selection criteria and treatment techniques of SBRT for cardiac ablaion.
Understand the indications, contra-indications, patient selection criteria and treatment techniques of SBRT for treating early-stage breast cancer.
Understand the indications, contra-indications, patient selection criteria and treatment techniques of SBRT as a method of partial prostatectomy for the treatment of prostate cancer.
The instructor used technology effectively
Understand the indications, contra-indications, and patient selection criteria for SRS for the treatment of benign and malignant brain tumors, brain metastases, lesions of the spine and functional diseases.
Describe the technical aspects including dose, fractionation and delivery regimens of SRS for the treatment of benign and malignant brain tumors, brain metastases, lesions of the spine, and functional diseases.
Understand the outcomes, toxicities, and risks and benefits of SRS for the treatment of benign and malignant brain tumors, brain metastases, lesions of the spine, and functional diseases.
The instructor used technology effectively
Understand the indications, contra-indications, and patient selection criteria for SBRT for the treatment of prostate and gynecological malignancies.
Describe the technical aspects including dose, fractionation and delivery regimens of SBRT for the treatment of prostate and gynecological malignancies.
Understand the outcomes, toxicities, and risks and benefits of SBRT for the treatment of prostate and gynecological malignancies.
The instructor used technology effectively
Provide an understanding of how these new technological developments will positively impact RT delivery strategies
Evaluate the accuracy, positioning, and features of radiation delivery and imaging for each new technology presented
Identify the patients that would benefit from potentially improved outcomes with the implementation of these new technological developments
The instructor used technology effectively
Describe the current applications of the automatic treatment planning appraoch.
Understand the principles and techniques of using automatic planning.
Learn how to implement auto planning in the clinical workflow.
The instructor used technology effectively
Describe quality assurance recommendations for robotic radiosurgery.
Describe best practices in pre-treatment plan quality assurance for SRS/SBRT.
Describe quality assurance methods for surface-based tracking.
The instructor used technology effectively
Discuss studies on the development of radiosurgery techniques.
Describe the principles of quality assurance and technology of radiosurgery.
Dsecribe methods to improve SRS/SBRT treatment planning and delivery.
The instructor used technology effectively
Describe the role of immunotherapy for the treatment of cancer.
Summarize how immunotherapy and stereotactic radiation therapy can be used in combination to treat brain metastases, lung cancer and metastatic melanoma.
Describe the study objectives and challeges of multi-modality clincal trials using combination immunotherapy and stereotactic radiation therapy for the treatment of cancer.
Please rate the following:
The program was relevant to my work.
Content matched stated objectives.
Usefulness of handouts/AV.
Quality of facilities and facility accommodations.
How well did the educational sessions give a balanced view of therapeutic options, including the use of generic names?
If you rated any of the above questions with 'fair,' 'poor,' 'disagree,' or 'strongly disagree' please explain in detail (e.g. session title, speaker name, situtation):
Please tell us about any sessions you found particularly good or bad
Please tell us about any objectives you feel we accomplished well or poorly 
Please tell us about any presenters you found particularly good or bad
Please answer the following:
Do you believe this activity was appropriate for the scope of your professional activities?
Was the educational content scientifically sound?
If faculty spoke about off-label or investigational uses of a product, was that information disclosed to you?
Was the mode of education effective to learning?
If you answered "No" to any of the above questions, please explain.
Did you perceive any product/service/company/commercial bias in any educational session you attended or materials you received?
If you answered "Yes" to the above question, please detail the situation below (e.g. session title, speaker name):
Were you solicited by sales personnel in an educational room (other areas do not matter) while you attended this educational activity?
If you answered "Yes" to the above question, please explain in detail (e.g. who, when, where):
How much did you learn as a result of this education program?
What specifically did you learn during this activity that you intend to integrate into your practice?

What questions have arisen in your practice for which you need answers/strategies that you can implement?

What patient/client problems or patient/client challenges do you feel you are not able to address appropriately or to your satisfaction?
What problems are your patients/clients communicating to you that need attention or follow up?

Are you interested in basic, intermediate or advanced level trainings?

What barriers might you have that would interfere with implementation of new information learned from this training?

How can this training (the overall meeting) be improved to better impact competence, performance and/or patient/client outcomes?

Additional comments:

Mr question
Provided by amedco