Please rate the following:
Overall quality of the session
Please rate the following questions:
The program was relevant to my work.
The expertise of the speaker(s).
Overal quality of the meeting.
The teaching ability of the speaker(s).
Content matched stated objectives.
The organization of materials
Usefulness of handouts/AV.
Achievement of the objective.
Achievement of the following objective: Discuss the mechanisms of information coding in the brain.
Achievement of the following objective: Identify the key components of peak performance.
Achievement of the following objective:
Identify the effects of HRV biofeedback on experimentally induced inflammation.
Achievement of the following objective: Utilize a comprehensive assessment protocol, including semi-structured clinical interview, behavioral rating scales, and neuropsychological and neurophysiological measures in order to improve diagnostic accuracy, enhance treatment initiation and retention rates, and guide the selection of effective neurotherapy and/or medication treatments.
Achievement of the following objective: Identify the science behind neurofeedback.
Achievement of the following objective: Discuss the source of the DC potential.
Achievement of the following objective: Describe current research data regarding mechanisms of cell death following brain and spinal cord injury.
Achievement of the following objective: Describe how to market differently, depending upon the target audience.
Achievement of the following objective: Discuss the concept of resonance in HRV biofeedback.
Achievement of the following objective: List the available codes that can be used for billing biofeedback.
Comfort of room.
Construct protocols for disorders such as hypertension, anxiety, IBS, and asthma.
How well did the educational activity give a balanced view of therapeutic options, including the use of
generic names?
Do you believe this activity:
increased your professional knowledge?
will increase your professional competence?
will result in performance changes in your professional practice?
was appropriate for the scope of your professional activities?
will result in your ability to improve your practice?
Was the educational content scientifically sound?
Was the educational content free from commercial bias?
If faculty spoke about off-label or investigational uses of a product, was that information disclosed to you?
Was the mode of education effective to learning?
Were you solicited by sales personnel in an educational room while you attended this educational activity?
List any perceived practice "gaps" which you would like to see the focus of future trainings.
What barriers might you have that would interfere with implementation of new information learned from this activity?
How can this training be improved to impact your competence or practice?
Please list any educational needs you would like to see addressed in future programs.
Additional comments:
