Logo1
ISHLT - 30th Anniversary Meeting and Scientific Sessions
Mr pencil

How would you like your name to appear on your certificate?



Agreement
By completing this form, you attest that you have attended the activity in its entirety.
Please rate the following:
The program was relevant to my work.
Content matched stated objectives.
The educational sessions gave a balanced view of therapeutic options, including the use of generic names when possible.
The relevant portion of the ISHLT 2010 Scientific Sessions program did/will result in my improved competence and professional performance in the areas of organ preservation, procurement, donor management and their implications for organ viability, donor selection, and recipient outcomes.
The relevant portion of the ISHLT 2010 Scientific Sessions program did/will result in my improved competence and professional performance in the areas of identification, prevention, and improvement of treatment for post-heart transplant management and the management of infectious diseases and other complications to improve patient outcomes.
The relevant portion of the ISHLT 2010 Scientific Sessions program did/will result in my improved competence and professional performance in the areas of comparing and evaluating the advantages and disadvantages of various mechanical circulatory and respiratory support systems and their associated patient selection criteria as well as the treatment of complications of VAD therapy and how to deal with end of life situations as well as psychological problems.
The relevant portion of the ISHLT 2010 Scientific Sessions program did/will result in my improved competence and professional performance in the areas of describing the state-of-the-art in clinical left heart failure, right heart failure, and lung failure treatment and the criteria for and outcome implications of transplant versus non-transplant therapies.
The relevant portion of the ISHLT 2010 Scientific Sessions program did/will result in my improved competence and professional performance in the areas of evaluating issues of controversy in the selection of candidates for heart and lung transplantation, such as age, prior transplantation, and co-morbidities.
The relevant portion of the ISHLT 2010 Scientific Sessions program did/will result in my improved competence and professional performance in the areas of evaluating the advantages and disadvantages of various pharmacologic, non-pharmacologic, and biologic immunosuppression techniques.
The relevant portion of the ISHLT 2010 Scientific Sessions program did/will result in my improved competence and professional performance in the areas of understanding the various methods of diagnosing, monitoring, and treating transplant rejection to improve patient outcomes.
The relevant portion of the ISHLT 2010 Scientific Sessions program did/will result in my improved competence and professional performance in the areas of how psychosocial and behavioral issues impact clinical post-transplant outcomes and quality of life for patients.
The relevant portion of the ISHLT 2010 Scientific Sessions program did/will result in my improved competence and professional performance in the areas of identifying current animal and other laboratory models relevant to the basic science of transplant immunobiology and discuss their application to the transplant setting.
The relevant portion of the ISHLT 2010 Scientific Sessions program did/will result in my improved competence and professional performance in the areas of understanding the immunobiology of organ selection and techniques utilized to detect and quantify HLA and non HLA antibody and the application of crossmatch results to select donors and subsequent post transplant management.
If you rated any of quesitons 1 - 14 above with 'disagree,' or 'strongly disagree' please explain: 

Please answer the following:
I believe this activity was appropriate for the scope of my professional practice.
The educational content was scientifically sound.
The mode of education was effective for learning.

Was the educational content free from commercial bias?

If you answered "No" to the above question, please list the session(s) where biased information was presented, the presenter(s) or chair(s) who exhibited bias and describe the specific nature of the bias exhibited.

Were you solicited by sales personnel in an educational room while you attended this activity?

If you answered "Yes" to the above question, please explain:
How could this training be improved to impact your competence or performance in practice?
What did you learn during this activity that you intend to integrate into your practice?
What general patient care issues do you feel you are not able to address appropriately or to your satisfaction?
Are you interested in basic, intermediate or advanced level trainings?
What barriers might you have that would interfere with implementation of new information from this training?
Additional comments:
Mr question