Logo1
LTG QEEG and LORETA Introductory and Intermediate Workshop
Mr pencil

How would you like your name to appear on your certificate?



How many credit hours did you complete?
Agreement
By completing this form, you attest that you have attended the number of hours you have indicated above.
Please rate your satisfaction with the content and quality of the program: 
Was the educational content scientifically sound?
If no, please explain...
Did you perceive any commercial bias or influence in the educational content?
If yes, what...
Did this program improve your competence or performance? 
If yes, how...
If no, please explain...
What did you learn that will help you in your practice?
Were the following objectives met?
Objective 1: Describe a brief history of surface and LORETA neurofeedback and the differences between both approaches.
Were the following objectives met?
Objective 2: List pharmacological effects on EEG.
Were the following objectives met?
Objective 3: Explain how to artifact an EEG
Were the following objectives met?
Objective 4: Define the role of Brodmann areas in regards to Quantitative EEG (qEEG) and definitions of phase, absolute and relative power and coherence.
Were the following objectives met?
Objective 5: Identify the differences between Z Score 4 channel, Z Score 19 channel and LORETA Z Score Neurofeedback
Were the following objectives met?
Objective 6: Develop a file structure for use in developing protocols for surface, LORETA neurofeedback, and Brain Surfer neurofeedback.
Were the following objectives met?
Objective 7: Utilize the symptom checklist based on more than 150 disorders in order to develop neurofeedback training protocols.
Were the following objectives met?
Objective 8: Develop data-driven and fusion protocols for surface and LORETA neurofeedback.
Were the following objectives met?
Objective 9: Demonstrate LORETA neurofeedback session with audience participant including QEEG analysis, protocol development and evaluation of changes in the EEG during the training session.
The program was up-to-date and relevant to my professional practice 
Was the location suitable?
The facilities were conducive to learning
Rate the following for all instructors
Instructor was knowledgeable about the content
Rate the following for all instructors
Instructor presented the subject matter clearly
Rate the following for all instructors
Instructor was responsive 
Rate the following for all instructors
Instructor used technology, hand outs and other learning aids effectively
Additional questions about the instructor(s)
What questions are you having in your practice that you would like to see addressed in an educational activity?
Questions, concerns and accommodations were addressed efficiently and in a timely manner
Additional comments
Mr question