Logo1
AcademyHealth's 2017 Annual Research Meeting Survey
Mr pencil

How would you like your name to appear on your certificate?



How many credit hours did you complete?
Agreement
By completing this form, you attest that you have attended the number of hours you have indicated above.
What is your primary employment setting?
If other, please specify.
Please indicate your AcademyHealth membership status.
If you would like membership information emailed to you, please provide your email address.
How many ARMs have you attended (including 2017)?
How did you hear about this year’s ARM conference?
If other, please specify
Please rate your overall satisfaction with the Conference. (1=poor, 4=exceptional)
In general, how many other conferences do you attend each year?
How would you rate this conference in relation to other conferences of this type that you have attended? (1=worse, 4=much better)
Did you book your hotel room within or outside the designated conference hotels organized through AcademyHealth?
If you booked outside the hotel block organized by AcademyHealth, which hotel was it?
If you booked outside the hotel block organized by AcademyHealth, why?
Did you present or participate in a panel discussion or poster session at this year’s ARM? (check all that apply)
Please answer the following:
Are you planning to attend the 2018 Annual Research Meeting in Seattle?
Why or why not?
AcademyHealth’s vision is to improve health and health care by generating new knowledge and moving that knowledge into policy and practice
How well did the ARM support and/or promote the generation of relevant, rigorous evidence? (1=poor, 4=very well)
How well did the ARM support and/or promote the dissemination, translation and use of evidence to inform policy and practice?(1=poor, 4=very well)
To what degree did each of the following influence your decision to attend the meeting? Answer all that apply (1=No influence, 4=Great influence)
Overall program content
Specific topics relevant to your work
Presentation opportunities
Employer paid registration
Location of the meeting
Networking
Career development
Other
In your opinion, how important are each of the following elements to the value of the meeting? (1=Not important, 4=Very important)
Concurrent sessions
Plenary sessions
Poster sessions
Exhibits
Continuing Education Credits
Agenda book
Online agenda
PowerPoint presentations posted online
Online attendee resource center
Adjunct Meetings
Networking
Wireless internet availability
Other
What is your overall assessment of the conference app? (1=poor, 4=exceptional)
Comments on conference app:
How well do you think the following meeting objectives were met? (1=Poor, 4=Excellent)
Discuss the latest results of health services research
Examine critical health care and health policy issues
Sharpen skills in research methods
research resources and funding priorities
Network
Did you attend a Poster Session?
If yes, do you have suggestions for improvement to the poster sessions?
Did you visit the Exhibitors
If yes, do you have suggestions for improvement for the exhibit hall?
How would you rate the overall quality and usefulness of the following 90 minute methods workshop? (1=poor, 4=excellent; N/A=did not attend)
Applying PROs in Clinical Practice (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate
Using Bayesian Analysis to Produce More Useful and Robust Estimates of Intervention Impacts (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate)
Methods to Improve Identification of the Mechanisms Underlying Disparities in Health and Healthcare (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate)
Conducting Mixed Methods Research in Health Sciences (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate)
Enhancing Implementation Science: Applying Systems Models to Address Complexity (Level of Difficulty: Beginner)
Ensuring the Quality of Big Data for HSR (Level of Difficulty: Beginner)
The ACA & PCOR Trust Fund Have Advanced Patient and Family Involvement in Research. What Is Left to Do? (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate)
Improving the Use of Case Studies for Health Services and Policy Research and Evaluation (Level of Difficulty: Beginner to Intermediate)
Innovations in Qualitative Methods (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate)
Structural Equation Models: Complex Models for Complex Questions (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate)
Evaluating Complex Interventions (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate)
Please indicate which NEW Methods topics and proposed Chairs you would like to see featured at the 2018 ARM.
Topic and Chair:
Topic and Chair:
Topic and Chair:
In general, in which of the following research areas would professional development opportunities or general support be most useful to you? (Please select all that apply)(1=Not important, 4=Very important)
data analysis
data collection
disseminating your research findings
identifying funding sources
identifying issues where new research is most required
having your research be useful and impactful
how to talk to policymakers
research design
measurement
sampling
writing proposals
Other
What experiences and activities are important to build your career? (1=Not important, 4=Very important)
Mentoring
Networking
Leadership opportunities
Publishing opportunities
Speaking/presentation opportunities
Funding opportunities
Volunteer opportunities with AcademyHealth
Contact with health services researchers
Contact with health policy makers
Contact with health care practitioners
Opportunities to attend AcademyHealth events
Other
We’d love to hear what you have to say. Please provide a brief (1-2 sentences) testimonial about your experience at the 2017 ARM. Note: By offering the testimonial, you agree to let AcademyHealth implement it (as is) in any future marketing communications around this conference.
General comments: 
Gender (optional)
Ethnic background (optional)
The information you provide on this firm is confidential. If you would like someone from AcademyHealth to follow up with you about your responses, please provide your name and email address:
Name:
Email:
Mr question