The process of scholarship application was clear and not burdensome.
The schedule of Saturday mornings 9 am-1 pm was convenient and allowed me to attend the course.
The application process for the Course was appropriate and easy to navigate.Â
The orientation meeting was convenient for my schedule (Friday night).Â
The orientation meeting was helpful to set my expectations for the course and important as a beginning point.
The orientation meeting was long enough to achieve the goals of introduction and orientation.
The assigned readings were useful and added to the learning for each module.Â
The amount of assigned readings were appropriate and I was able to complete them comfortably within my schedule.
I felt the suggested additional readings were helpful and completed several of them.
I will likely refer to readings on the suggested list in the future.Â
The locations for the modules were convenient and comfortable.
There was an adequate number of modules and topics covered.
The time of each module meeting was adequate. an adequate number of modules and topics covered.
The depth of the material covered was what I expected/hoped for.
Overall, the teaching methods and meeting formats used were effective, and conducive to learning.
Participation in the experience group simultaneously added significantly to my understanding of the didactic material (if applicable).
I am likely to participate in an experience group or further group leadership training in the near future.
If I had questions, they were answered fully and quickly by the Committee contact person (Joel Krieg).
The material covered was scientifically sound and relevant to the most recent developments, trends and issues in group psychotherapy.
The educational content was free from commercial bias.
The educational sessions gave a balanced view of therapeutic options, including generic names if medications were discussed.
In the educational sessions, faculty appropriately and adequately disclosed off-label or investigational uses of a product.
Overall, I was very satisfied with the 2016 Principles Course.Â
Â
What topic areas appealed to you most in your decision to enroll in this course? (check all that apply)
Which factor played the largest role in your decision to enroll in this course? (check up to 5)
Something that would result in improved competence, performance and/or patient outcomes in my practice if it were offered by NSGP is:
What questions do you have from your training or practice that you would like addressed in future trainings?
What patient problems or patient challenges have you noticed that you are not currently able to address appropriately or to your satisfaction?
Do you believe this course was appropriate for the scope of your professional practice or activities? (please answer “yes” or “no” and add additional information as desired).
How important are the following elements in your decision to attend this Conference?
Knowledge/expertise of the faculty.Â
Relevance of conference topics.Â
Opportunities for networking.Â
Continuing education credit.Â
I benefit the most from the following types of learning (check all that apply)
Did any specific issues arise which impacted or made learning more difficult for you during the course?
Do you plan on attending 2016 NSGP Annual Conference June 5-7? Why or Why not?
Other reactions and suggestions you would like to share with the Training Committee regarding this course or future courses?
