Logo1
UCSF - The Nathan Bass UCSF Liver Transplant Conference 2015
Mr pencil

How would you like your name to appear on your certificate?



What activities did you attend at the event?
Agreement
By completing this form, you attest that you have participated in all selected activities in thier entirety.
Please rate the speaker(s) as a group.  You will have the opportunity to elaborate on an individual speaker in the following question. 
Please rate the speaker(s) as a group.  You will have the opportunity to elaborate on an individual speaker in the following question. 
Please rate the speaker(s) as a group.  You will have the opportunity to elaborate on an individual speaker in the following question. 
Please rate the speaker(s) as a group.  You will have the opportunity to elaborate on an individual speaker in the following question. 
Please rate the speaker(s) as a group.  You will have the opportunity to elaborate on an individual speaker in the following question. 
Please rate the speaker(s) as a group.  You will have the opportunity to elaborate on an individual speaker in the following question. 
Please rate the speaker(s) as a group.  You will have the opportunity to elaborate on an individual speaker in the following question. 
Please rate the speaker(s) as a group.  You will have the opportunity to elaborate on an individual speaker in the following question. 
Please rate the speaker(s) as a group.  You will have the opportunity to elaborate on an individual speaker in the following question. 
Please rate the speaker(s) as a group.  You will have the opportunity to elaborate on an individual speaker in the following question. 
Please rate the speaker(s) as a group.  You will have the opportunity to elaborate on an individual speaker in the following question. 
Please rate the speaker(s) as a group.  You will have the opportunity to elaborate on an individual speaker in the following question. 
Please rate the speaker(s) as a group.  You will have the opportunity to elaborate on an individual speaker in the following question. 
Please rate the speaker(s) as a group.  You will have the opportunity to elaborate on an individual speaker in the following question. 
Please rate the following:
The program was relevant to my work.
Content matched stated objectives.
Usefulness of handouts/AV.
Quality of facilities.
How well did the educational sessions give a balanced view of therapeutic options, including the use of generic names?
If you rated any of the above questions with 'fair,' 'poor,' 'disagree,' or 'strongly disagree' please explain in detail (e.g. session title, speaker name, situtation):
If you have additional comments regarding the session or individual speaker(s) - e.g. teaching ability, expertise, organization of materials, etc. - please use the space below:
If you have additional comments regarding the session or individual speaker(s) - e.g. teaching ability, expertise, organization of materials, etc. - please use the space below:
If you have additional comments regarding the session or individual speaker(s) - e.g. teaching ability, expertise, organization of materials, etc. - please use the space below:
If you have additional comments regarding the session or individual speaker(s) - e.g. teaching ability, expertise, organization of materials, etc. - please use the space below:
If you have additional comments regarding the session or individual speaker(s) - e.g. teaching ability, expertise, organization of materials, etc. - please use the space below:
If you have additional comments regarding the session or individual speaker(s) - e.g. teaching ability, expertise, organization of materials, etc. - please use the space below:
If you have additional comments regarding the session or individual speaker(s) - e.g. teaching ability, expertise, organization of materials, etc. - please use the space below:
If you have additional comments regarding the session or individual speaker(s) - e.g. teaching ability, expertise, organization of materials, etc. - please use the space below:
If you have additional comments regarding the session or individual speaker(s) - e.g. teaching ability, expertise, organization of materials, etc. - please use the space below:
If you have additional comments regarding the session or individual speaker(s) - e.g. teaching ability, expertise, organization of materials, etc. - please use the space below:
If you have additional comments regarding the session or individual speaker(s) - e.g. teaching ability, expertise, organization of materials, etc. - please use the space below:
If you have additional comments regarding the session or individual speaker(s) - e.g. teaching ability, expertise, organization of materials, etc. - please use the space below:
If you have additional comments regarding the session or individual speaker(s) - e.g. teaching ability, expertise, organization of materials, etc. - please use the space below:
If you have additional comments regarding the session or individual speaker(s) - e.g. teaching ability, expertise, organization of materials, etc. - please use the space below:
How well were objectives met?
How well were objectives met?

Identify the current therapies and endpoints

Compare functional and complete HBV cure

List virally targeted strategies to achieve these cures

Discuss decision making about candidacy for liver transplant

Discuss concepts about elderly patients with acute liver failure

Discuss the current status of liver allocation and its impact on liver transplantation in the Bay Area

Name the different categories of donors (i.e. Infectious high risk, split livers, DCD) and the risk/benefit ratio associated with these categories)

Identify the challenges of matching donor with recipient

Discuss how sick is too sick for liver transplant

Explain new frameworks for predicting post-transplant outcomes and for discussing expectations from liver transplant and assessing patient preferences in high-risk surgical decision-making

Name the advantages of living donor transplant in pediatric patients

Identify strategies for increasing the priority of our patients awaiting liver transplant, in current system and with future policies

Discuss current research protocols offered at UCSF for treatment of chronbic Hepatitis C in children.

Explain the new techniques to utilize marginal liver donors

Discuss therapeutic options for chronic pancreatitis

Having completed the activity, please rate your ability to meet each of the following objectives:

Discuss the ECHO model

List the benefits to both patients and providers in rural areas

Name the advantages of living donor transplant for patients waitlisted for liver transplantation

Discuss the donor risk of death with living liver donation

Discuss how livers will be allocated

Discuss what’s next in liver allocation

Describe the role of liver transplantation for patients with HCC who are downstaged into conventional (Milan) transplant criteria

Identify the key predictors of HC recurrence post-LT, including modifiable factors such as pre-LT wait time

Discuss the rising incidence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Explain clinical and biologic heterogeneity of cholangiocarcinoma

Discuss existing data on length of sobriety and its impact on post-transplant recidivism as well as the additional risk factors for post-transplant recidivism

Discuss the impact of post-transplant recidivism on patient outcomes

List the pros and cons of liver transplantation in patients with end stage alcoholic liver disease who have not completed 6 months of sobriety (the six-month rule)

Explore the relationship between beta blocker use and hepatic decompensation

Explain the concept of the “window” period for beta blocker use in cirrhotics

Explain the limitations of current therapy, especially in regards to emergence of resistance and impact on future treatment options

Describe how to maximize SVR rates in patients pre and post-LT through improved understanding of antiviral drug selection, management of drug-drug interaction and adherence

Explain what to expect from an ECHO hub and spoke

Evaluate treatment options for cholangiocarcinoma

Discuss the current literature and the pros and cons of liver transplantation for severe alcoholic hepatitis

Objective 1: Discuss live donor transplant issues and how organs are distributed at UCSF
By meeting the above objective my professional competence will increase because I have acquired new strategies to use in my practice.
By meeting the above objective my professional performance will improve because I should be able to implement the new strategies.
By meeting the above objective my patient outcomes should improve due to the implementation of newly-learned strategies.
Objective 2: Identify the pros and cons of the 6-month rule for liver transplantation in alcoholic liver disease
By meeting the above objective my professional competence will increase because I have acquired new strategies to use in my practice.
By meeting the above objective my professional performance will improve because I should be able to implement the new strategies.
By meeting the above objective my patient outcomes should improve due to the implementation of newly-learned strategies.
Objective 3: Discuss new and evolving treatments for hepatitis B and Hepatitis C
By meeting the above objective my professional competence will increase because I have acquired new strategies to use in my practice.
By meeting the above objective my professional performance will improve because I should be able to implement the new strategies.
By meeting the above objective my patient outcomes should improve due to the implementation of newly-learned strategies.
Objective 4: Discuss treatment options for hepatocellular cancer and cholangiocarcinoma
By meeting the above objective my professional competence will increase because I have acquired new strategies to use in my practice.
By meeting the above objective my professional performance will improve because I should be able to implement the new strategies.
By meeting the above objective my patient outcomes should improve due to the implementation of newly-learned strategies.
Please answer the following:
Do you believe this activity was appropriate for the scope of your professional activities?
Was the educational content scientifically sound?
If faculty spoke about off-label or investigational uses of a product, was that information disclosed to you?
Was the mode of education effective to learning?
If you answered "No" to any of the above questions, please explain.
Did you perceive any product/service/company/commercial bias in any educational session you attended or materials you received?
If you answered "Yes" to the above question, please detail the situation below (e.g. session title, speaker name):
Were you solicited by sales personnel in an educational room (other areas do not matter) while you attended this educational activity?
If you answered "Yes" to the above question, please explain in detail (e.g. who, when, where):
How much did you learn as a result of this education program?
What specifically did you learn during this activity that you intend to integrate into your practice?

What questions have arisen in your practice for which you need answers/strategies that you can implement?

What patient/client problems or patient/client challenges do you feel you are not able to address appropriately or to your satisfaction?
What problems are your patients/clients communicating to you that need attention or follow up?

Are you interested in basic, intermediate or advanced level trainings?

What barriers might you have that would interfere with implementation of new information learned from this training?

How can this training (the overall meeting) be improved to better impact competence, performance and/or patient/client outcomes?

Additional comments:

Mr question