How would you like your name to appear on your certificate?

Profession

What activities did you attend at the event?

Wednesday, March 25 - 1:00 - 5:00 pm - Pre-Event Forum Part I

Thursday, March 26 - 8:30 - 9:15 am - Opening Keynote

Thursday, March 26 - 9:15 - 10:15 am - Keynote Reactor Panel

Thursday, March 26 - 10:45 - 12:00 pm - Case Study Panel

Thursday, March 26 - 1:15 - 2:00 pm - Concurrent Executive Seminars A & B

Thursday, March 26 - 2:05 - 2:50 pm - Concurrent Executive Seminars A & B

Thursday, March 26 - 3:05 - 3:50 pm - Concurrent Executive Seminars A & B

Thursday, March 26 - 3:55 - 4:55 pm - Plensary Session

Thursday, March 26 - 5:00 - 5:45 pm - Closing Keynote

Friday, March 27 - 8:30 - 9:15 am - Opening Keynote

Friday, March 27 - 10:30 - 11:30 am - Keynote Panel

Friday, March 27 - 11:30 - 12:30 pm - Internation Panel

Friday, March 27 - 1:30 - 2:30 pm - Panel Discussion

Friday, March 27 - 2:30 - 3:30 pm - Closing Keynote

Agreement

By completing this form, you attest that you have participated in all selected activities in thier entirety.

I agree

Please rate the following:

The program was relevant to my work.

Content matched stated objectives.

Usefulness of handouts/AV.

Quality of facilities.

How well did the educational sessions give a balanced view of therapeutic options, including the use of generic names?

If you rated any of the above questions with 'fair,' 'poor,' 'disagree,' or 'strongly disagree' please explain:

Please rate the speaker(s) as a group. You will have the opportunity to elaborate on an individual speaker in the following question.

Objective 1: Describe how to use practical application of Evidence Based Medicine in a clinical based environment for better patient outcomes.

The above objective will increase my professional competence.

The above objective will result in changes to performance in my professional practice.

The above objective will result in improved patient outcomes.

If you have additional comments regarding the session or individual speaker(s) - e.g. teaching ability, expertise, organization of materials, etc. - please use the space below:

Objective 2: Compare the differences between comparative effectiveness and cost effectiveness to enhance performance for improved patient outcomes.

The above objective will increase my professional competence.

The above objective will result in changes to performance in my professional practice.

The above objective will result in improved patient outcomes.

Discuss the various ways in which EHRs and clinical decision support systems can help improve quality of care, safety, and adherence to evidence.

Apply these principles to their own setting, both from a technical and from a policy/communications standpoint.

Discuss the need for an objective, timely, evidence-based organization such as the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health.

Describe the process used by the Common Drug Review in the consideration of clinical effectiveness, safety, and cost-effectiveness of new drugs in comparison to other available therapies.

Explain how the Common Drug Review program supports decision-making with respect to the funding of new drugs.

Objective 3: Collect the tools and techniques needed to measure evidence to improve competence, performance skills and yield better patient outcomes.

The above objective will increase my professional competence.

The above objective will result in changes to performance in my professional practice.

The above objective will result in improved patient outcomes.

Examine the challenges faced when conducting Randomized Control Trials.

Assess the existing positive clinical and economic advantages to applying negative pressure wound treatment over other treatment modalities.

Discuss new evidence supporting negative pressure wound therapy in diabetic care.

Discuss a variety of current and future personalized medicine markets.

List the strategies that bring personalized medicine to the forefront of medical care.

Discuss how observational research can be used to fill evidence gaps and support decision-making.

Describe some criteria that can be used to gauge the quality and evidence value of observational studies of comparative effectiveness.

Cite examples of observational studies of comparative effectiveness that have been used to support significant decisions.

Recognize the importance of teaching physicians-in-training how to assess their performance through performance measurement and feedback based on EBM guideline-determined treatment goals.

Cite challenges of implementing real-time performance feedback systems for medical trainees.

Identify the tools and approaches best support clinical policy deployment.

Discuss the usefulness of evidence ratings and what are the challenges in assessing the evidence for effectiveness of new technologies?

Dsicuss the implications of evidence based policy deployment.

Develope a comprehensive evidence report based on review of over 600 articles.

Examine how Duke produced a clinical practice guideline and a linked set of clearly defined clinical performance measures.

Discuss pilot testing and how the tool kit was embraced in community settings demonstrating improved care processes.

Assess the potential of personalized medicine to address the current challenges facing today's heatlh care system.

Evaluate the transformation of transparency from a tool used for sales purposes to an influence of physician practice.

Identify the key issues regarding the use of metrics around cost: Does Evidence Based Medicine practice save money.

Assess the use of Evidence Based Medicine to drive consumer preferences based on benefit design and information on providers.

Objective 4: Discuss CMS' Perspective on Evidence Based Medicine - What they are doing in terms of reimbursement and what future projects will effect the country to gain improved competence.

The above objective will increase my professional competence.

The above objective will result in changes to performance in my professional practice.

The above objective will result in improved patient outcomes.

Objective 5: Explore how patients feel about Evidence Based Medicine and how to work with them in a clinical setting for improved patient outcomes.

The above objective will increase my professional competence.

The above objective will result in changes to performance in my professional practice.

The above objective will result in improved patient outcomes.

Please answer the following:

Do you believe this activity was appropriate for the scope of your professional activities?

Was the educational content scientifically sound?

Was the educational content free of commercial bias?

Was the mode of education effective to learning?

If you answered "No" to any of the above questions, please explain.

Were you solicited by sales personnel in an educational room while you attended this educational activity?

If you answered "Yes" to the above question, please explain.

What did you learn during this activity that you intend to integrate into your practice?

My professional competence would be improved if I had training on:

My professional performance would be improved if I had training on:

My patient outcomes would be improved if I had training on:

Are you interested in basic, intermediate or advanced level trainings?

What barriers might you have that would interfere with implementation of new information learned from this training?

How can this training be improved to better impact competence, performance and/or patient outcomes?

Additional comments: