Logo1
APS - Toward Precision Cancer Care: Biobehavioral Contributions to Exposome
Mr pencil

How would you like your name to appear on your certificate?



What activities did you attend at the event?
Agreement
By completing this form, you attest that you have participated in all selected activities in thier entirety.
Please answer the following questions as they relate to the Sloan presentation:
Expertise of presenter.
Quality of content delivered.
Effectiveness of teaching method.
Ability to meet the objective: Define the physiological signaling pathways that enhance metastasis
Expertise of presenter.
Quality of content delivered.
Effectiveness of teaching method.
Ability to meet the objective: Discuss the epidemiologic evidence linking physical activity to cancer risk and prognosis.
Ability to meet the objective: Review the evidence from randomized trials testing the impact of physical activity on cancer outcomes.
Ability to meet the objective: List the biologic mechanisms through which physical activity could impact cancer risk and outcomes.
Expertise of presenter.
Quality of content delivered.
Effectiveness of teaching method.
Ability to meet the objective: Discuss the role of social relationships in cancer mortality.
Ability to meet the objective: Summarize biological mechanisms that may underlie associations between social relationships and cancer survival.
Expertise of presenter.
Quality of content delivered.
Effectiveness of teaching method.
Ability to meet the objective: Assess risk that will inform targeted recommendations for biologic and behavioral interventions aimed at minimizing cancer onset and progression.
Ability to meet the objective: Describe how does neural signaling facilittaes tumor cell dissemination
Ability to meet the objective: Explain how beta-blockers may protect against cancer progression
Please rate the following:
The program was relevant to my work.
Content matched stated objectives.
Usefulness of handouts/AV.
Quality of facilities.
How well did the educational sessions give a balanced view of therapeutic options, including the use of generic names?
If you rated any of the above questions with 'fair,' 'poor,' 'disagree,' or 'strongly disagree' please explain in detail (e.g. session title, speaker name, situtation):
Expertise of presenter.
Quality of content delivered.
Effectiveness of teaching method.
Ability to meet the objective: Explain the rationale for using cognitive behavioral stress management (CBSM) to optimize adaptation and health outcomes in breast cancer.
Ability to meet the objective: Identify the biobehavioral processes that may explain the effects of CBSM on health outcomes in breast cancer.
Expertise of presenter.
Quality of content delivered.
Effectiveness of teaching method.
Ability to meet the objective: Discuss the epidemiologic evidence linking diet and obesity to cancer risk and prognosis
Expertise of presenter.
Quality of content delivered.
Effectiveness of teaching method.
Ability to meet the objective: Discuss complex etiology of breast cancer.
Effectiveness of teaching method.
Ability to meet the objective: Review the evidence from randomized trials testing the impact of dietary change and weight loss on cancer outcomes
Ability to meet the objective: Explore the biologic mechanisms through which diet and obesity could impact cancer risk and outcomes
Ability to meet the objective: Define the potential role of environment on early female development.
Ability to meet the objective: Describe aspects of social determinants that may play a role in environmental exposures.
Please answer the following questions as they relate to the Cole presentation:
Expertise of presenter.
Quality of content delivered.
Effectiveness of teaching method.
Ability to meet the objective: Describe biobehavioral pathways by which psychological factors may influence cancer progression 
Effectiveness of teach method.
Effectiveness of teaching method.
Ability to meet the objective: Discuss promising psychological and biological intervention targets based on a biobehavioral model of cancer. 
Ability to meet the objective: Discuss potential intervention modalities, including combination approaches, based on biobehavioral oncology research findings.. 
Please answer the following question as it relates to the Dialogue portion:
Effectiveness of teaching method.
Additional Comments:
Please answer the folllowing questions as they relate to the Rappaport presentation:
Expertise of presenter.
Quality of content delivered.
Effectiveness of teaching method.
Ability to meet the objective: Define the exposome concept.
Ability to meet the objective: Explain the role(s) of biomarkers in understanding causes of disease.
Ability to meet the objective: Identify useful biomarkers of exposure and disease progression by using exposome-wide association studies.
Additional Comments:
Please answer the following questions as they relate to the McClintock presentation:
Expertise of presenter.
Quality of content delivered.
Effectiveness of teaching method.
Ability to meet the objective: Identify necessary and sufficient conditions for regulating physiological and cellular function 
Ability to meet the objective: Identify key components of the glucocorticoid stress response and location of tissue receptors in the mammary glands 
Ability to meet the objective: Conceptualize a life course developmental process in an evolutionary context of fertility and survival
Please answer the following question as it relates to the Debate/Discussion portion:
Effectiveness of teaching method.
Additional Comments:
Objective 1: Describe how you would make personalized risk assessments that will inform targeted recommendations for biologic and behavioral interventions aimed at minimizing cancer onset and progression.
By meeting the above objective my professional competence will increase because I have acquired new strategies to use in my practice.
By meeting the above objective my professional performance will improve because I should be able to implement the new strategies.
By meeting the above objective my patient outcomes should improve due to the implementation of newly-learned strategies.
Objective 2: Utilizing models from ethology and from epidemiology explain how to frame a scientific question about level of risk for cancer onset and progression.
By meeting the above objective my professional competence will increase because I have acquired new strategies to use in my practice.
By meeting the above objective my professional performance will improve because I should be able to implement the new strategies.
By meeting the above objective my patient outcomes should improve due to the implementation of newly-learned strategies.
Please answer the following:
Do you believe this activity was appropriate for the scope of your professional activities?
Was the educational content scientifically sound?
If faculty spoke about off-label or investigational uses of a product, was that information disclosed to you?
Was the mode of education effective to learning?
If you answered "No" to any of the above questions, please explain.
Did you perceive any product/service/company/commercial bias in any educational session you attended or materials you received?
If you answered "Yes" to the above question, please detail the situation below (e.g. session title, speaker name):
Were you solicited by sales personnel in an educational room (other areas do not matter) while you attended this educational activity?
If you answered "Yes" to the above question, please explain in detail (e.g. who, when, where):
How much did you learn as a result of this education program?
What specifically did you learn during this activity that you intend to integrate into your practice?

What questions have arisen in your practice for which you need answers/strategies that you can implement?

What patient/client problems or patient/client challenges do you feel you are not able to address appropriately or to your satisfaction?
What problems are your patients/clients communicating to you that need attention or follow up?

Are you interested in basic, intermediate or advanced level trainings?

What barriers might you have that would interfere with implementation of new information learned from this training?

How can this training (the overall meeting) be improved to better impact competence, performance and/or patient/client outcomes?

Additional comments:

Mr question