Logo1
PCQC - 2023 LIVE Quality Matters Conference
Mr pencil

How would you like your name to appear on your certificate?



What activities did you attend at the event?
Agreement
By completing this form, you attest that you have participated in all selected activities in thier entirety.
Please rate the following:
The program was relevant to my work.
Content matched stated objectives.
Quality of facilities and facility accommodations.
How well did the educational sessions give a balanced view of therapeutic options, including the use of generic names?
If you rated any of the above questions with 'fair,' 'poor,' 'disagree,' or 'strongly disagree' please explain in detail (e.g. session title, speaker name, situtation):
The instructor presented the subject matter clearly
By meeting the above objective my professional competence will increase because I have acquired new strategies to use in my practice.
By meeting the above objective my professional performance will improve because I should be able to implement the new strategies.
By meeting the above objective my patient outcomes should improve due to the implementation of newly-learned strategies.
The teaching methods used were appropriate to the objectives
Objective 2: To share best practices in delivering high-quality palliative care to clinicians and administrators providing care to patients.
By meeting the above objective my professional competence will increase because I have acquired new strategies to use in my practice.
By meeting the above objective my professional performance will improve because I should be able to implement the new strategies.
By meeting the above objective my patient outcomes should improve due to the implementation of newly-learned strategies.
The teaching methods used were appropriate to the objectives
The instructor was knowledgeable about the content
The instructor was knowledgeable about the content
The instructor was knowledgeable about the content
The instructor was knowledgeable about the content
The instructor was knowledgeable about the content
The instructor was knowledgeable about the content
The instructor was knowledgeable about the content
The instructor was knowledgeable about the content
The instructor was knowledgeable about the content
Objective 3: To highlight emerging areas of focus within quality that will define and inform quality-based palliative care for palliative care programs in the future.
By meeting the above objective my professional competence will increase because I have acquired new strategies to use in my practice.
By meeting the above objective my professional performance will improve because I should be able to implement the new strategies.
By meeting the above objective my patient outcomes should improve due to the implementation of newly-learned strategies.
The teaching methods used were appropriate to the objectives
The instructor presented the subject matter clearly
Explore the concept of quality measurement in palliative care and why it is essential for assessing the effectiveness of care delivery.
Recognize the role of quality measurement in ensuring the highest quality of care for palliative care patients and their loved ones
The instructor presented the subject matter clearly
Highlight gaps in the serious illness care literature on advancing equitable care.
Understand guiding principle seeking and including the perspectives of patients and caregivers to address inequities.
Describe ways that clinicians and other research team members can leverage the collective strengths of a diverse team to promoted patient-centered goal concordant care.
The instructor presented the subject matter clearly
Recognize the multidimensional palliative care needs of persons living with Parkinson’s and those who care for them.
Review the evidence supporting palliative care approaches to improving patient and family-centered outcomes.
Understand the challenges and opportunities in changing cultures and challenging systems to integrate palliative care as a new standard of care for Parkinson’s.
The instructor presented the subject matter clearly
Characterize how palliative care program operations vary across setting types
Compare staffing models of palliative care teams
Demonstrate how the PCQC Registry can be utilized to identify areas of growth and opportunity for our field
The instructor presented the subject matter clearly
   To be able to describe the PCOC model that drives improvements in palliative care outcomes both at an individual patient level and health service level (e.g., palliative care unit or consult service)
To be able to describe the PCOC suite of measures and PCOC service reports inform quality improvement benchmarking initiatives to ensure national improvements, and monitoring and surveillance of palliative care outcomes
To be able to describe how the PCOC model can help improve equity in palliative care outcomes
The instructor presented the subject matter clearly
Understand approaches to reliably and accurately identify a population of interest (i.e., denominator) for palliative care quality measurement from the EHR
Understand when NLP may be an important tool for palliative care quality measurement
Understand steps needed to apply methods within a health system
The instructor presented the subject matter clearly
Understand the landscape and role of telehealth in outpatient palliative care, including disparities in access and use of telehealth.
Explore the diverse ways in which PCQC data can be leveraged to examine utilization and clinical outcomes associated with telehealth.
The instructor presented the subject matter clearly
  Define the concept of workplace wellness and describe features of wellness based on national models
Articulate challenges to wellness in healthcare and palliative care and sources of burnout for clinicians
Describe individual, team and organizational strategies to care for palliative care clinicians
The instructor presented the subject matter clearly
Describe the need for quality and research in palliative care
Define quality and research and their intersection in clinical care and discovery
Discuss opportunities to leverage quality efforts and optimize collaboration between the PCQC Registry, Collaborative and research going forward
The instructor was responsive to participants
The instructor was responsive to participants
The instructor was responsive to participants
The instructor was responsive to participants
The instructor was responsive to participants
The instructor was responsive to participants
The instructor was responsive to participants
The instructor was responsive to participants
The instructor was responsive to participants
Please tell us about any sessions you found particularly good or bad.
The instructor used technology effectively
The instructor used technology effectively
The instructor used technology effectively
The instructor used technology effectively
The instructor used technology effectively
The instructor used technology effectively
The instructor used technology effectively
The instructor used technology effectively
The instructor used technology effectively
Please tell us about any objectives you feel we accomplished well or poorly. 
Please tell us about any presenters you found particularly good or bad.
Please answer the following:
Do you believe this activity was appropriate for the scope of your professional activities?
Was the educational content scientifically sound?
If faculty spoke about off-label or investigational uses of a product, was that information disclosed to you?
Was the mode of education effective to learning?
If you answered "No" to any of the above questions, please explain.
Did you perceive any product/service/company/commercial bias in any educational session you attended or materials you received?
If you answered "Yes" to the above question, please detail the situation below (e.g. session title, speaker name):
Were you solicited by sales personnel in an educational room (other areas do not matter) while you attended this educational activity?
If you answered "Yes" to the above question, please explain in detail (e.g. who, when, where):
How much did you learn as a result of this education program?
What specifically did you learn during this activity that you intend to integrate into your practice?

What questions have arisen in your practice for which you need answers/strategies that you can implement?

What patient/client problems or patient/client challenges do you feel you are not able to address appropriately or to your satisfaction?
What problems are your patients/clients communicating to you that need attention or follow up?

Are you interested in basic, intermediate or advanced level trainings?

What barriers might you have that would interfere with implementation of new information learned from this training?

How can this training (the overall meeting) be improved to better impact competence, performance and/or patient/client outcomes?

Additional comments:

How did you attend this course?
Mr question