Logo1
SPP - 2023 Society of Pediatric Psychology Fall Virtual Conference
Mr pencil

How would you like your name to appear on your certificate?



What activities did you attend at the event?
Agreement
By completing this form, you attest that you have participated in all selected activities in thier entirety.
Please rate the following:
The program was relevant to my work.
Content matched stated objectives.
Usefulness of handouts/AV/technology.
Quality of facilities and facility accommodations.
How well did the educational sessions give a balanced view of therapeutic options, including the use of generic names?
If you rated any of the above questions with 'fair,' 'poor,' 'disagree,' or 'strongly disagree' please explain in detail (e.g. session title, speaker name, situtation):
The instructor was knowledgeable about the content
The instructor was knowledgeable about the content
The instructor was knowledgeable about the content
The instructor was knowledgeable about the content
The instructor was knowledgeable about the content
The instructor was knowledgeable about the content
Objective 1: To dedicate a full day to learning about high impact areas of pediatric psychology research produced by SPP research leaders who come from diverse research backgrounds such as assessment, treatment and interventions, clinical outcomes, adherence, and health disparities.
By meeting the above objective my professional competence will increase because I have acquired new strategies to use in my professional work.
By meeting the above objective my professional performance will improve because I should be able to implement the new strategies.
By meeting the above objective my patient outcomes should improve due to the implementation of newly-learned strategies.
The teaching methods used were appropriate to the objectives
The instructor presented the subject matter clearly
The instructor presented the subject matter clearly
The instructor presented the subject matter clearly
The instructor presented the subject matter clearly
The instructor presented the subject matter clearly
The instructor presented the subject matter clearly
Objective 2: To provide a forum for discussion of current research directions and to consider how research informs clinical practice, service delivery, health equity, policy decisions.
By meeting the above objective my professional competence will increase because I have acquired new strategies to use in my professional work.
By meeting the above objective my professional performance will improve because I should be able to implement the new strategies.
By meeting the above objective my patient outcomes should improve due to the implementation of newly-learned strategies.
The teaching methods used were appropriate to the objectives
The instructor was responsive to participants
The instructor was responsive to participants
The instructor was responsive to participants
The instructor was responsive to participants
The instructor was responsive to participants
The instructor was responsive to participants
Did this program improve your Skill or Strategy in your professional role?
If no, why not?
Do you believe your participation in this activity will positively impact your professional work?
If yes, how?
If no, why not?
By meeting the above objective my professional competence will increase because I have acquired new strategies to use in my professional work.
By meeting the above objective my professional performance will improve because I should be able to implement the new strategies.
By meeting the above objective my patient outcomes should improve due to the implementation of newly-learned strategies.
The teaching methods used were appropriate to the objectives
The instructor used technology effectively
Discuss how an anti-racism strategies can be applied to a behavioral science study.
Describe at least one way design-thinking can enhance behavioral science.
The instructor used technology effectively
To describe methods to build partnerships with families as expert collaborators in research.
To apply health equity-informed implementation science methods and community-engaged strategies to intervention adaptation and evaluation research.
To discuss the role of pediatric psychologists and researchers in building meaningful relationships with family collaborators.
The instructor used technology effectively
Summarize findings from clinical trials of digital health interventions for pediatric pain.
Identify opportunities to promote inclusion, diversity, and equity in pediatric pain science.
The instructor used technology effectively
Describe the context and the breadth of pain inequities for children from racialized groups, using the experiences of children living with sickle cell disease as an exemplar.
Describe conceptual models to understand how racism and trauma interact to maintain pain inequities.
Discuss specific, actionable, antiracism strategies, including cultural humility, for pediatric psychologists to utilize and eliminate pain equities in clinical practice and research.
The instructor used technology effectively
Explain the process by which medical responsibility is transferred from parent to youth with spina bifida and identify factors associated with this transfer process.
Explain the complexity of the transition to adult health care in spina bifida and identify strategies to assess transition readiness and post-transition outcomes. 
The instructor used technology effectively
Discuss challenges and strategies to build a multidisciplinary transition program.
Describe ways to integrate a strengths-based perspective to promote successful transfer from pediatric to adult care.
Attendees will be able to identify best strategies from the literature for designing culturally sensitive psychosocial interventions.
Attendees will apply strategies to their own work or practice.
Attendees will discuss how to build a team to conduct high-quality cultural adaptation research.
Identify their “niche” and how to apply it to translational research in pediatrics.
Identify at least two strategies to “get started” in translational research.
Describe the context and the breadth of pain inequities for children from racialized groups, using the experiences of children living with sickle cell disease as an exemplar.
Identify barriers to the transition from parent-guided to adult self-management of survivorship care for childhood cancer survivors.
Describe the rationale for incorporating user input in the design of a digital intervention to improve self-management.
Explain how feasibility studies inform intervention refinement and planning, using an efficacy trial of a digital self-management and peer mentoring intervention for childhood cancer survivors as a model.
How much did you learn as a result of this CE program?
How much did you learn as a result of this CE program?
How much did you learn as a result of this CE program?
How much did you learn as a result of this CE program?
How much did you learn as a result of this CE program?
How much did you learn as a result of this CE program?
Please tell us about any sessions you found particularly good or bad.
How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development?
How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development?
How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development?
How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development?
How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development?
How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development?
Please tell us about any objectives you feel we accomplished well or poorly.
Please tell us about any presenters you found particularly good or bad.
Please answer the following:
Do you believe this activity was appropriate for the scope of your professional activities?
Was the educational content scientifically sound?
If faculty spoke about off-label or investigational uses of a product, was that information disclosed to you?
Was the mode of education effective to learning?
If you answered "No" to any of the above questions, please explain.
Did you perceive any product/service/company/commercial bias in any educational session you attended or materials you received?
If you answered "Yes" to the above question, please detail the situation below (e.g. session title, speaker name):
Were you solicited by sales personnel in an educational room (other areas do not matter) while you attended this educational activity?
If you answered "Yes" to the above question, please explain in detail (e.g. who, when, where):
How much did you learn as a result of this education program?
What specifically did you learn during this activity that you intend to integrate into your professional work?

What questions have arisen in your professional work for which you need answers/strategies that you can implement?

What professional challenges do you feel you are not able to address appropriately or to your satisfaction?

Are you interested in basic, intermediate or advanced level trainings?

What barriers might you have that would interfere with implementation of new information learned from this training?

How can this training (the overall meeting) be improved to better impact competence, performance and/or patient/client outcomes?

How much did you learn as a result of this CE program?
How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development?
Mr question
Provided by amedco