2016newlogowords
AACT June Section Webinar: Toxicology in Capital Cases - Working with Clients and their Attorneys on a Death Penalty Case - Methodologies Enduring
Mr pencil

How would you like your name to appear on your certificate?



Agreement
By completing this form, you attest that you have attended the activity in its entirety.
Was the educational content of value to you?
Was the educational content scientifically sound?
If no, please explain...
Did you perceive any commercial bias or influence in the educational content?
If yes, please explain...
Did this activity improve your Skills or Strategy?
If yes, how...
Do you think what you learned will benefit you in your practice?
If yes, how...
Tell us what was good or bad about any part of the educational activity, content, speakers, materials, anything
What questions are you having in your practice that you would like to see addressed in an educational activity?
PHARMACISTS: If you do not provide your NABP ID AND your DATE OF BIRTH, your hours will not be uploaded to CPE Monitor.
(CPE Monitor) NABP e-Profile ID (ePID) - Example 123456:
(CPE Monitor) Date of Birth (MM/DD) - Example September 24 would be 0924: 
Please rate Susan M. Skolly-Danziger
Content/Teaching Methods
Presentation/Handouts
Relevance of Content to Objectives
Independence, Objectivity, Balance, Scientific Rigor
Were the learning objectives met?
Have a basic understanding of aggravating versus mitigating circumstances in death penalty cases.
Describe the role of a mitigation expert in a death penalty case.
Be familiar with potential challenges/obstacles when retained in a death penalty case.
Recognize how the science of toxicology can be elpful to judges and juries in death penalty matter.
When you viewed this webinar, were you in a group or by yourself?
If in a group, with how many people?
Comments:
Mr question
Provided by amedco